cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
시간 횡령 (12誠鉉)

시간 횡령 (12誠鉉)

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

2021년 6월 24일의 에세이

지금으로부터 꽤 오래 전, 그러니까 12 시절부터 고안한 사고 프레임워크가 하나 있다. 개인은 의식이며 문명이고 국가다. 우리 모두는 우리 각자의 국가의 지도자이자 경영자이자 리더이다. 매일 일간 예산으로 24시간이 주어진다. 이제 당신은 국가의 지도자로써 그 예산을 어떻게 활용할 것인가?

을 알려면 우선 현대 誠鉉의 모든 이론의 바탕이 된 이 시간 횡령 이론부터 시작해야 한다. 안타깝게도 誠鉉은 무조건 효율. 무조건 성장. 무조건 개발. 무조건 발전. 만 주구장창 생각하던 사람이었다. 그래서 예산으로써 정당한 사용처는 딱 2가지였다. 확실하고 효율적으로 여가를 즐기거나, 확실하고 효율적으로 자기무한투자를 하거나.

이 외의 모든 사용처는 시간 횡령으로 간주되었다. 시간 횡령 중에서도 최악은 바로 계획치 않은 시간의 누수이다. 차라리 놀기 위해 준비하고 계획한 뒤에 시간을 보내면 모를까 (예를 들어 시간을 정해놓고 영화를 본다거나) 어딘가 자기무한투자를 계획해놓고 실제로는 다른 용도로 사용되거나 특히 이기적 만족을 위해 횡령되는 경우를 12-21誠鉉은 가장 싫어했다. 싫어한 이유는 14-18誠鉉이 자신이 얼마나 견고한 시간 앞에서 무능력한 존재인지를 체감했기 때문이다.

이 시간 예산 프레임워크와 무한성장 프레임워크는 훗날 수많은 자기연구의 대상이 된다. 또 몇 가지 준칙들의 기반이 된다. 예를 들어, 誠鉉은 전통적으로 과외, 알바 제의를 거절한다. 이 외에도 무의미한 감투나 허례허식적인 관례를 싫어한다. 이럼에도 언젠가 이런 제의를 받아들인 적이 있다면 그 거부감에 준하는 필요성이나 반사이익이 존재했다는 뜻이다. (물론 이 규칙들이 예외적으로 적용되던 이른바 "대확장 시대"도 존재한다. 대확장 시대에 대해서는 나중에 이야기해보자.)

최근 20誠鉉 이후로 인정하게 된 사실도 몇 가지 있는데, 그 중 하나는 대업을 완수하려면 어느 정도의 시간 횡령은 안고 가야 한다는 사실이다. 자기무한개발의 과정에서 어쩔 수 없이 발생하는 1-2시간 정도의 횡령? 어쩔 수 없다. 중요한 것은 完業 완업이다. 즉 시간 횡령은 통제과 관리의 대상이지 절대적 해악이 아니다. 물론, 여전히 시간 횡령은 일어나지 않는 것이 가장 좋다. 단지 초점이 얼마나 "시간이 낭비되고 있느냐--" 아니라 "일단 시간이 들긴 들어도 목표를 완수했느냐--" 로 이동한 셈이다.

또 다른 하나의 발견점은 "총력전은 불가능하다"는 것이다. 과거에는 총력전이 가능한 경우가 있었다. 하루밤새 스팀팩 먹고 달리면 정해진 목표가 달성되어 있는 경우가 있었다. 하지만 誠鉉의 목표 규모는 이미 단숨에 달성할 규모를 한참 전부터 넘었으며 이제 총력전은 불가능하니 목표 단위를 세분화하여 전략전술적 예산 배치가 필수적이라는 사실을 인지해야 한다.

오늘의 꿀팁: 자기계발과 자기개발은 모두 맞는 단어이다. '개발'은 '지식이나 재능 따위를 발달하게 함.'이라는 뜻이고 '계발'은 '슬기나 재능, 사상 따위를 일깨워 준다는 뜻이다. 즉,

  • 자기개발 = 이미 존재하는 능력과 철학을 더욱이 견고하게 발전시킴
  • 자기계발 = 외부의 새로운 슬기와 재능, 사상, 철학을 연구하고 도입함

의 차이인 것이다. 다만 자기무한개발은 개발과 계발의 영역을 모두 포함한다. 12誠鉉이라는 시절도 이런 프레임워크에서 비롯되었다. 마치 태종 12년과 같이 부르는 것이랑 비슷하다.

Backlinks1