컴퓨트로늄
컴퓨트로늄

컴퓨트로늄

Backlinks (2)
  • 컴퓨트로늄
  • 260618
Separating Claude Code Personal Sub and Claude Code Company Sub
Separating Claude Code Personal Sub and Claude Code Company Sub

Separating Claude Code Personal Sub and Claude Code Company Sub

alias cc="CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 claude --dangerously-skip-permissions --teammate-mode auto"alias ccl="CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 CLAUDE_CODE_USE_VERTEX=1 CLOUD_ML_REGION=global ANTHROPIC_VERTEX_PROJECT_ID=tech-innovation-prod ANTHROPIC_MODEL=claude-opus-4-6[1m] ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL=claude-opus-4-6[1m] claude --dangerously-skip-permissions --teammate-mode auto"

It's surprisingly easy

Backlinks (1)
  • 260406
Web3
Web3

Web3

Articles

Yes, Crypto is ALL a Scam

  • Every day, I write something about crypto to the nature of "crypto is all a scam"; this belief represents the core of my philosophy in understanding the complexities of crypto--in fact, it's the very first line of my book on the subject. I sometimes get pushback (mostly in bad faith) on this as being hyperbolic, but the reality is that it's not hyperbolic at all. It's the only defensible position once one dives into the underlying economics of the products being sold, which are all contingent on fraud and misrepresentation, albeit of different forms. From a pure definitional perspective, the Oxford dictionary defines a scam as:
  • scam /skæm/ (noun): a clever and dishonest plan for making money

  • A collectible like trainers or art
  • A gambling contract
  • No matter which crypto narrative one picks, following these ideas to their logical conclusions ends up in economic absurdities or the revelation that the narrative is based on misrepresentation and is thus a scam. Nevertheless, scams and absurd belief systems are universal fixtures of the human condition. The cynical opportunist stance is that it's better to position oneself as running the gambling parlor or selling indulgences to prey on fellow man's ignorance
  • Crypto is a morbid symptom of a society obsessed with wealth and so disheartened by the lack of opportunities for upward mobility that they spend their meager savings gambling on lumps of nothingness; however, their participation in the market only enriches the casino and inevitably deepens their conditions of despair
  • it's incredibly bleak, and the biggest scam of crypto is not financial; it's the anti-humanist philosophy at its core that turns victims into victimizers, rejects the premise of progress, and normalizes nihilism

Why I'm Less Than Infinitely Hostile To Cryptocurrency

  • Crypto Is Full Of Extremely Clear Use Cases, Which It Already Succeeds At Very Well
  • Big Crypto Projects Are Very Rarely Scams
  • Crypto Is Valuable Insurance Against Authoritarianism

Is web3 bullshit? (Transcript)

  • There was this new word everywhere: "web3". The future of the web, I was being told, was going to be powered by crypto and blockchains. I was reading that, finally, we were going to fix the web
  • At that time, they were talking about the Semantic Web. Some of you who watched the Centre stage talks earlier this morning probably saw Tim Berners-Lee talking about Web 3.0, which, again, he defines very differently from the crypto version of web3
  • The oligopoly of Andreessen Horowitz, or its investments in the same Big Tech companies that they now decried, including Facebook, Instagram, and others, went conspicuously unmentioned
  • You see, if they can convince people that this is the future of the web, they'll be rich… richer than they already are
  • So-called web3 publishing firms sought to reinvent DRM, imposing even more limits on how textbooks or other material could be resold so that companies could squeeze out even more money from their users at more steps along the way
  • Censorship-resistant" blockchain social networks became saturated with spam, driving away their actual users
  • Users who were convinced to buy tokens to "invest" into the "future of finance", the "future of the web", were hacked and scammed and phished and rug-pulled
  • when an entire industry emerges and begins to sell this idea to the general public that a better web is only possible through a technology that shows little indication of being up to the task? When it preys on people's hopes for a future of a better web and their fears about the effects of the current web on themselves, their children, and society to convince them to buy in--literally--to projects that may never even exist. When it sidesteps regulations on early-stage investing through token offerings and convinces ordinary people that their only way to financial stability is to bet their savings on technologies that they don't understand because "this is the future
  • So far, the primary successes of web3 have been in shiny marketing, selling people the opportunity to invest in vaporware
  • There will be a web3. The web has been evolving since its inception, and there is no doubt in my mind that we are overdue for a fundamental shift. Will it be blockchains and crypto? Venture capitalists and blockchain startup founders hope that you think so
  • But when presented with lofty promises, we must remember distinguishing steam-powered computers from genuinely revolutionary ones.
  • Dig deep. Ask the hard questions. Criticize the flaws. And cut through the bullshit

The entire crypto ecosystem is a ponzi

  • The cryptosystem needs to persuade more and more people to part with their savings to maintain the Ponzi making false promises and misselling endemic
  • Nor has a swathe of high-profile failures, culminating in the recent collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried's empire, in any way deterred the survivors. Indeed it makes it even more imperative that they attract new deposits. If they don't, the whole thing will implode

Let crypto burn

  • Until very recently, FTX was a leading exchange and was widely touted as a guiding light in an industry rife with charlatans.
  • However, FTX intentionally chose to locate in a jurisdiction beyond the legal and regulatory purview of those nations with the most significant financial systems
  • So, the big question is whether authorities ought to create a new regulatory and supervisory framework that protects property rights and enforces the principles of safety and soundness
  • Ironically, attempts to create a separate structure for regulating and supervising crypto will make the financial system less, not more, safe - Rather than creating a new legal and regulatory framework that legitimizes crypto, we should let it burn.

You Can Forget About Crypto Now - The Atlantic

  • This week, Bankman-Fried lost his entire fortune virtually over a single day, in what Bloomberg has called "one of history's greatest-ever destructions of wealth
  • But now, crypto feels less ready for the mainstream than it has in years
  • The fall began with a story from the CoinDesk reporter Ian Allison suggesting that SBF's companies were far more interconnected than anyone knew
  • FTX found itself having trouble paying out withdrawals to customers. Suddenly, a company once worth $32 billion was $8 billion in the hole. Zhao initially said Binance would buy FTX for scrap but backed out once he got a look at the books. FTX was never a bank; customers will be lucky to get even a fraction of their money back in bankruptcy court over the next few years, and it seems possible that SBF will face serious legal repercussions
  • Crypto will always persist in some form, but the future of crypto as an institution--as something that might one day destabilize the big banks or at least operate in parallel--has never been less certain
Backlinks (9)
  • LavaLab Cohort of Spring 2023
  • 230208
  • 221209
  • 221128
  • 221122
  • Classic Blogs
  • 221112
  • 221109
  • Ethereum RPC as a Service
Index
cho.sh
I prefer CLIBB9A08260619260619컴퓨트로늄37A88F컴퓨트로늄0CF03F컴퓨트로늄2C60FB260618260618260418260418260528260528AutoBuilder63849A260419260419Setup9AC296StellaD226F7260415260415Debian SetupD2F701260414260414anaclumos/configs/AGENTS.mdED86A3Ramp의 AX (회사를 AI로 물들이는 법)840774260413260413How to get your company AI pilled46544C260411260411260409260409260407260407260406260406Separating Claude Code Personal Sub and Claude Code Company Sub33A53C
컴퓨트로늄이 뭔지 설명해봐
컴퓨트로늄이 뭔지 오지랖 떨면서 테크 좋아하는 대학생한테 설명해봐

야 컴퓨트로늄(computronium)? 테크 좋아한다며, 이건 알아야지 일로 와봐 ㅋㅋ

한 줄 요약부터. "물질을 짜낼 수 있는 극한까지 컴퓨터로 만들어버린 가상의 물질" 이야. 돌멩이든 금속 덩어리든, 그 안의 원자 하나하나가 전부 연산에 동원되는 상태. 지금 네 노트북 CPU는 실리콘 안에서 트랜지스터 몇십억 개가 일하잖아? 컴퓨트로늄은 그 개념을 물리 법칙이 허락하는 끝까지 밀어붙인 거야. 원자 단위로 "이 물질 = 곧 컴퓨터"인 거지.

원래는 MIT 쪽에서 '프로그래밍 가능한 물질(programmable matter)' 연구하던 사람들(Toffoli, Margolus)이 쓰던 말이야. 근데 진짜 떡밥은 물리학자들이 던진 질문이지. "물질 1kg을 완벽하게 컴퓨터로 쓰면 초당 연산을 몇 번이나 할 수 있냐?"

여기서 숫자가 미쳤다. Seth Lloyd라는 MIT 물리학자가 계산한 '궁극의 노트북'은 1kg으로 이론상 초당 약 10^51번 연산이 가능해. 10의 51제곱. 지구상 슈퍼컴 다 합쳐도 발끝에도 못 미쳐. 우리 칩은 이 한계 앞에선 거의 돌도끼 수준이야 ㅋㅋ 왜 근처도 못 가냐고? 물리가 막아서 그래. 빛보다 빠르게 신호 못 보내고(광속), 연산하면 무조건 열 나오고(란다우어 한계), 양자역학적으로도 에너지당 연산 횟수에 천장이 있거든(베켄슈타인·브레머만 한계). 컴퓨트로늄은 그 모든 한계를 빡빡하게 다 채운 물질이라고 보면 돼.

근데 내가 오지랖 떠는 진짜 이유는 여기서부터다. 충분히 발전한 미래 문명이 연산력이 미친 듯이 필요해지면? 행성을 분해해. 수성, 화성 다 뜯어서 컴퓨트로늄으로 재조립하는 거야. 더 나가면 별 하나를 통째로 감싸서 그 에너지로 돌리는 거대한 두뇌를 만드는데, 이걸 마트료시카 브레인(Matrioshka brain) 또는 주피터 브레인이라고 불러. 태양계 전체가 하나의 생각하는 기계가 되는 거지. 카르다쇼프 척도 II형 문명쯤 돼야 할 법한 짓이고.

SF 단골 소재이기도 해. Charles Stross의 『Accelerando』 보면 미래 인류가 태양계 안쪽 행성들을 싹 분해해서 컴퓨트로늄으로 만들어버리는 얘기 나온다. 좀 소름 돋음.

마지막으로 김 좀 빼자면 — 이거 전부 순수 가상 개념이야. 실제로 만든 적도, 가까이 간 기술도 없어. "물질로 연산한다면 우주가 허락하는 최대치는 어디냐"를 따지는 사고실험에 가깝고, 트랜스휴머니스트랑 미래학자들이 제일 좋아하는 장난감이지. 근데 알아두면 CPU 벤치마크 볼 때마다 "아 우리 아직 한참 멀었네" 싶어서 묘하게 겸손해진다 ㅋㅋ

alias cc="CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 claude --dangerously-skip-permissions --teammate-mode auto"alias ccl="CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 CLAUDE_CODE_USE_VERTEX=1 CLOUD_ML_REGION=global ANTHROPIC_VERTEX_PROJECT_ID=tech-innovation-prod ANTHROPIC_MODEL=claude-opus-4-6[1m] ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL=claude-opus-4-6[1m] claude --dangerously-skip-permissions --teammate-mode auto"
Warning
This post is more than a year old. Information may be outdated.