cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
한국에서 글로벌로

한국에서 글로벌로

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

한국 시장의 특징

한국은 꽤 독특한 시장이다. 민족도 언어도 거의 하나고, 1인당 GDP도 높고, 교육 수준이랑 기술 이해도도 높다. 그래서 다른 시장에서 통하던 방식을 그대로 가져오면 망할 수 있다. 성공하려면 한국의 이런 특징을 감안해서 글로벌 전략을 다시 짜야 한다.

한국 시장 규모

시가총액 수조 원짜리 한국 스타트업들의 공통점은 다들 모르는 사람이 없고 다들 쓴다는 것이다. 국내 시장이 작으니까 전 국민을 상대로 하지 않으면 큰 회사를 만들기가 어렵다. 근데 미국에서는 의료 전문가용 소셜 미디어 하나로 50억 달러 넘는 상장사가 나온다.

글로벌 시장에서는 잘게 쪼갠 세부 시장을 공략해도 훨씬 큰 시장을 열 수 있다. 한국에서는 만드는 사람이 곧 쓰는 사람이라서 직관으로 기획하고 개발하는 게 보통이다. 근데 다른 나라에서는 만드는 사람과 쓰는 사람이 다르면 제품을 제대로 만들기가 어렵다.

데이터 기반 제품 기획과 개발

그래서 글로벌 제품을 만들 땐 만드는 사람과 쓰는 사람 사이의 간극을 메우려고 데이터를 꼭 모아야 한다. 데이터가 있어야 헛발질이 줄고 결정도 나아진다.

한국 스타트업이 자꾸 빠지는 패턴

한국 스타트업은 한국 시장은 잘 알지만 글로벌 시장은 잘 모르는 경우가 많다. 새 시장에서 성공하려면 일단 내가 모른다는 걸 인정하고 제대로 알려고 애써야 한다. 한국 시장에서는 개인 문제와 기업 문제를 다 풀어야 하지만, 글로벌 시장에서는 특정 하위 시장 하나를 골라 문제를 깊게 파는 게 더 흔하다. 시장을 어떻게 쪼갤지 정하고 깊은 문제를 찾으려면 고객을 직접 만나서 데이터를 모아야 한다.

먼저 고객을 만나라!

성겸 님은 결정을 내릴 때 고객 인사이트가 제일 중요하다고 강조한다. 고객을 이해한다는 건 고객의 문제에 공감한다는 뜻이다. 데이터(숫자)만으로는 결정을 내리기에 모자라다. 그러니까 미국에 처음 진출할 때는 시장을 찾는 데 시간과 자원을 써야 한다. 고객을 만나서 문제 가설을 세우고 피드백을 기록하는 데만 최소 3~6개월이 걸린다. 이걸 건너뛰면 방향을 잃고 자원만 날린다. 고객과 대화해서 인사이트를 얻는 법으로 김성겸 님은 "The Mom Test"라는 책과 YCombinator의 "How To Talk To Users" 영상을 추천한다.

뭘 해야 할지 모르면 채용하지 마라.

어차피 좋은 사람은 안 온다. 김성겸 님은 초기 스타트업이라면 대학생이나 MBA 졸업생을 단기 인턴으로 뽑아서, 창업자랑 같이 사업 계획의 중요한 질문들에 답을 찾게 하라고 권한다. 글로벌 시장에서 학습 곡선을 타는 데는 시간이 걸리고, 해외 시장에 자원을 몰아줘야 글로벌 J-커브를 그릴 수 있다.

"이스라엘 스타트업은 글로벌 확장을 어떻게 하나?"

김성겸 님은 한국 스타트업이 "어중간한 크기의 "에 갇혀서 큰 그림을 못 보고 있는 건 아닌지 다시 생각해 봤다고 한다. 이스라엘 스타트업 전문가의 답은, 글로벌 확장에 만능 해법 같은 건 없다는 것이었다.

Backlinks0

No backlinks found