sudo apt update && sudo apt install git && /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)" && echo >> ~/.bashrc && echo 'eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv bash)"' >> ~/.bashrc && eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv bash)" && sudo apt-get install build-essential && brew install gcc btopOpenClaw, Hermes, Poke를 쓰며 느낀 단점들
내가 만약 워크스페이스 에이전트를 만든다면 어떻게 만들까?
Why? Multi-tenant environments. First, we need to understand a few differences between environments:
So
Most people physically separate their tenancy, such as Claude Code, from their personal vs. work laptops. So in most cases, it's not a big deal.
But when you need multi-tenancy, it becomes super stressful. For example, say you have two different toolkits:
Most MCP auth states or code harnesses don't support profiles, so you can only log in to one.
So therefore... a natural evolution was to have both:
to physically isolate tenancies.
Now we've solved the multiple-profile issue, but the client's problems persist. Now let's get back to the environments:
All MCP auth or toolkit auth info should always be saved in the Agent Runtime Environment IMHO. However, a surprising number of harnesses tie them to the LLM server (such as Codex Apps or Claude.ai Plugins) or put them in the end-user UI (Claude Desktop or Codex Desktop).
Now the problem is:
The only way to reliably isolate different auth information is thus:
Then
are both isolated VPS, and
This way, you can provide different toolkits, creating multiple dev environments.
sudo apt update && sudo apt install git && /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)" && echo >> ~/.bashrc && echo 'eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv bash)"' >> ~/.bashrc && eval "$(/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/bin/brew shellenv bash)" && sudo apt-get install build-essential && brew install gcc btop