cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing Iโ€™ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, Iโ€™m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! Iโ€™ve spent years sharing what Iโ€™ve learned, reviewing random peopleโ€™s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because thereโ€™s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didnโ€™t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. Thatโ€™s my mistake. So Iโ€™ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. Iโ€™m still worried about cheating. That problem hasnโ€™t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But thatโ€™s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things youโ€™ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someoneโ€™s life. โค๏ธLiked on XItโ€™s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved ๐Ÿ‘€Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X๐Ÿฆ Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings โšก It uses up to 4,212ร— fewer tokens and is 27ร— faster than full context inference while more accurate ๐ŸŽฏ Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread ๐Ÿงต:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soonโ„ข. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
AI replaces expensive jobs first

AI replaces expensive jobs first

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

Expensive Jobs?

The obvious two:

  • Doctors ๐Ÿง‘โš•
  • Lawyers ๐Ÿง‘โš–

Why are expensive jobs expensive ๐Ÿ’ฐ?

Labor gets expensive when demand is high and supply can't grow. Health and legal trouble show up all the time (someone gets hurt, someone gets sued), and it's hard to find a person who never needs either in their whole life. Demand never goes away.

Supply barely moves. Why?

  • It grows slowly, because:
    • Good doctors and lawyers take years and years of training.
    • The "prestigious" schools that train them only turn out dozens of people a year.
  • And we can't just pump out more, because:
    • Not many people can study for ten years in the first place.
    • Forcing the numbers up causes a backlash (read: underqualified professionals).
  • The few we do get work slowly.
    • How many patients can one doctor see in a day?
      • People already complain about factory-style clinics that move patients along like a conveyor belt.
    • How long does one lawsuit take to resolve?

So supply always falls behind demand.

Then why can AI replace expensive jobs?

Two reasons. Economics, and performance.

Economics

Making AI is expensive, because:

  1. Good AI needs a really clean dataset.
  2. A clean dataset needs a lot of data with clear patterns.

And it's hard in any field. Exaggerating a little, a cleaning AI is about as hard to build as a medical AI.

  • To build a perfect cleaning AI...
    • To judge how dirty a room is, you need
      • millions of room photos labeled with how dirty they are.
      • millions of examples of each kind of mess and how to deal with it.
        • Water spill โ†’ Dishcloth
        • Garbage โ†’ Trash can
        • Dust โ†’ Vacuum
    • Then each fix has to be trained until it works.
      • Millions of examples of wiping with a dishcloth
      • Millions of examples of picking up and throwing out garbage
      • Millions of examples of using a vacuum well

So even a cleaning AI costs a fortune. Which means if it's going to be hard to build anyway, you want a model that pays off big and adapts to a lot of cases. That's why it makes sense to train AI for expensive labor first. That's where the return on investment is.

Performance

AI also never forgets, and it can copy itself. Imagine:

  • A doctor who never forgets a thing from med school. A lawyer who remembers every case perfectly.
  • The best doctors and lawyers cloned into thousands of AIs, each taking clients at the same time.
  • Anything newly discovered, shared with all of them instantly.
  • A doctor who remembers every detail about you and catches problems before they happen.
  • Your family doctor, available whenever, wherever.

Industry Resistance

SEOUL (Reuters) - Korea's parliament on late Friday passed a controversial bill to limit ride-hailing service Tada, dealing a blow to a company that has been a smash hit since its launch in late 2018 but faced a backlash from taxi drivers angry over new mobility services. - Korea passes bill limiting Softbank-backed ride-hailing service Tada

The recent TADA war was a classic alliance-versus-megacorp fight. The taxi drivers won in the end, but it was a hollow win. The real winner was another conglomerate, Mobility, which ended up taking over the market.

Doctors and lawyers will push back hard too, and they hold immense social power. Easy to picture how that goes.

Scenarios

  • Medical AI kills a patient! Can we really bet our lives on a half-baked machine?
    • Whatever the context, that kind of fear can turn people into tech Luddites.
  • Lawyer AI caught discriminating? Can we let a biased machine run our country?
    • Precedents can look biased depending on how you cut the statistics. If someone cuts them in bad faith and frames the AI as biased toward some group, it can snowball into a movement against AI as a whole, whatever the context.

Potential Strategy

๐Ÿต The monkey and the flower shoes

In the animal kingdom, there was a naive monkey. One day, a badger came and gave the monkey a pair of colorful sneakers. The monkey didn't need shoes but took them since they were a gift. After that, the badger kept bringing sneakers, and the calluses on the monkey's feet slowly wore thin. Soon the monkey couldn't go out without shoes and ended up depending on the badger.

Start with a platform that helps doctors and lawyers.

  • DOCTORS: Start with a medical CRM. When a patient comes in, their information is pulled together before the visit starts. During the visit, what the patient says is parsed automatically and the AI pulls out keywords. The medical staff checks them. Similar cases and suggested treatments and prescriptions show up on one side of the screen. The doctor picks the right one and goes ahead, or adds a new treatment. All of this is saved on the server and used to train on later.
  • LAWYERS: Start with a case analyzer. Begin with small local cases (e.g., traffic tickets), like DoNotPay - The World's First Robot Lawyer. As more and more cases go into the database, lawyers can search for similar ones, kind of like "Google Search." Say a fraud case comes in. The lawyer types in the details, dozens of past precedents come up, and the AI breaks down how they're alike and how they're different.
  • Basically GitHub Copilot, but for medicine and law.

Hand out . Tools doctors and lawyers find genuinely useful and can't work without. Make them your main customers and your data pipeline. In a market as entrenched as medicine or law, never open with an all-out war. Build a friendly relationship first, defang them, and only then go to war.

Articles

AI will replace middle management before robots replace hourly workers

  • robots that must be built by robots to perform a specific task once done by a person, or a program capable of making the best possible business decision given historical and currently available data
  • If you said the latter, you're correct. The "robot revolution" is not coming first; the AI decision-making paradigm shift will, and it is going to save corporations billions of dollars in salary costs per year as middle management disappears
  • Legacy businesses will have to rely on retail and hourly support staff to be able to reduce management headcount as a means of freeing up money for implementing automation
  • AI managers are the missing link between the when and how of implementing retail-level automation. Reducing middle management, freeing up cash flow, incentivizing hourly workers, and implementing automation will all depend on the fecundity and vision of senior leadership
Backlinks2