This page is still under construction.

Parts of this page are still being built. What you see may change.

Prime Spiral

Time limit2sMemory limit1024 MB

Summary
Given two numbers in the Ulam spiral, find the shortest path between their cells moving only through composite cells, or report impossible.
Level

Medium6 of 10

Topics
BFS, Number theory, Implementation, Math
Solved
No attempts yet

Problem

Boredom can be good for creativity. The Polish mathematician Stanislaw Ulam (1909-1984) discovered the spiral that bears his name while listening to a "long and very boring paper". He started by writing the positive integers in a spiral on a grid, one number per grid cell. Then he crossed out the composite numbers (the non-primes). An interesting property he discovered was that the remaining prime numbers seem to line up along many diagonals of the grid:

All positive integersOnly primes

Both of these are infinitely large grids, but due to physical constraints only a finite subset of the grid fits in this space.

Consider traveling around the second grid above (the Ulam spiral). You may move freely to any cell containing a composite number, but moving to a cell containing a prime number is not allowed. You can travel up, down, left, or right, but not diagonally. Write a program to find the length of the shortest path between two composite numbers, if such a path exists. For example, from the cells numbered 12 and 72 it is impossible to travel to any other composite cell. The length of a path is the number of steps on the path.

Input

Each test case is given on one line containing two integers 1 ≤ x, y ≤ 10,000, which indicate two cells in the grid. There are limits on the input values, but the path between x and y is not limited in any way.

Output

For each case, display the case number followed by the length of the shortest path between the cells x and y, or "impossible" if no such path exists.

Examples1

  1. Example 1

    Input
    1 4
    9 32
    10 12
    
    Expected output
    Case 1: 1
    Case 2: 7
    Case 3: impossible