cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
효과적 가속주의

효과적 가속주의

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

EA : pledging 44B to foundation

e/acc : buying twitter

George Hotz 🐀 (@realGeorgeHotz), November 27, 2022

오직 가지고 싶은 것은 드높은 문화의 힘이다 -- 백범 김구

효과적 가속주의

  1. 인류에게 무엇보다 중요한 목표는 의식의 빛(The light of consciousness)을 보존하는 것이다.

이것이 우리가 우주 문명이 되어 다른 행성으로 생명을 연장함으로써 의식의 빛을 보존해야 하는 이유입니다. https://t.co/UDDP8I1zsS

-- Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 25, 2018

  1. 기술과 시장의 힘(기술적 자본주의)은 힘과 능력이 더더욱 강해지고 있다.
  2. 이는 멈출 수 없다.

저는 이 모든 것에 대해 약간 걱정이 되고, 다른 사람들도 왜 그러는지 이해할 수 있습니다.

하지만 기차가 속도를 줄이지 않고 있어요. 당신은 이것을 피하기 위해 경제를 재설계할 수 없습니다. GPU를 없앨 수 없습니다. 모든 문제는 온라인으로 해결해야 합니다.

-- bayeslord (@bayeslord) May 30, 2022

  1. 기술적 자본은 우리를 의식의 다음 진화로 인도할 수 있다. 이는 상상할 수 없는 차세대 생명체 (Unthinkable next-generation lifeforms) 및 컴퓨터 상의 의식(Silicon-based awareness)의 창조를 포함한다.
  2. 새로운 형태의 의식은 본질적으로 지각(Sentience)을 더 다양하고 견고하게 만들 것이다. 우리는 이를 원한다.
  3. 기술은 수단이다 (Technology is leverage). 기술이 발전함으로써 생각을 가진 모든 생명체를 전 우주에서 멸종시키는 일이 더 쉬워진다. 진보를 멈추는 일은 절대 안전한 일이 아니다.
  4. 사회와 그 안의 개인적 맥락은 빠르게 변화하고 있으며, 더 불안정한 사회와 마음의 병을 낳는다. (비영토화와 재영토화)
  5. 인공지능과 기술적 자본의 초변수(hyper-parameters)를 먼저 통제하는 자는 이 의식의 미래에 강력한 대리 권한(Agency)을 얻을 것이다.

우리는 뭔가를 해야만 한다. 가속주의가 답한다: 이제서야? 이제라도 시작해야하지 않을까?

  1. 인간은 그 대리 권한(Agency)을 지금 가지고 있다. 우리는 이 과정에 있는 변곡점의 등장에 영향을 줄 수 있다.
  2. 효과적 가속주의(e/acc)는 이 기술적 자본의 특이점이 등장할 가능성을 최대화하며, 그로 인해 등장하는 지각의 능력을 최대화하길 원하는 사상과 행동의 집합이다.

적어도 우리 대화에서는 포스트 인도주의적 각도에 초점을 맞췄습니다. 생명, 지능, 그리고 우리가 아는 모든 메타 유기체를 만든 도형적 최적화 알고리즘이 있을 것입니다. 효과적 가속주의는 이 동적인 다차원 적용의 범위와 규모를 확장하는 것을 목표로 합니다.

-- Beff Jezos -- e/acc (@BasedBeff) May 31, 2022

효과적 이타주의(Effective Altruism, EA)와의 차이점

e/acc가 다른 EA들에 비해 무섭게 느껴지길 원하지만 그것이 목표는 아니다.

EA는 초점이 명확하지 않으며 인류 앞에 놓인 선택지 아래 행동할 의지가 부족하다.

지각을 지지하는 기술적 자본의 특이점의 옆에서 지켜보기만 하거나 (Steward) 아니면 죽기살기로 도전하거나 (Die trying)

효과적 이타주의와는 다르게, 효과적 가속주의는:

  • 문제에 있어 현대적, 기술적 해결책(modernist technocratic solutions)을 지지하지 않는다
  • EA들이 "모든 것이 그냥 좀 멈췄으면(just slow down)" 같이 말하는 것처럼 수동적으로 위험성을 싫어하지 않는다
  • 인간중심적이지 않다: 번영하기만 한다면 의식은 좋은 것
  • 미래가 얼마나 빨리 오는지에 대해 부정하지 않는다
  • 장기적인 효과적 이타주의자와는 달리 패놉티콘적 미래를 원치 않는다

역자 주

패놉티콘은 정보가 한 곳에 모여 한 눈에 확인할 수 있는 원형 감옥이다. 기술 발달로 인해 소수의 권력이 다수를 감시한다는 뜻으로 주로 활용된다. 1984의 빅 브라더를 연상하면 편하다.

효과적 이타주의와 비슷하게, 효과적 가속주의는:

  • 규범적이다
  • 더 긍정적인 감정가를 좋다고 받아들인다
  • 전 우주에 알아볼만한 어떠한 지각도 없는 것이 최악의 결과라고 받아들인다
Backlinks8