cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
미국 이행 장치

미국 이행 장치

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

의 에세이.

내가 미국으로 다시 강제로 돌아오도록 를 설정해둘 수 있을까. 한국에서 전문연구요원을 마치고 나면 한국이라는 컴포트 존에 갇히게 되어 다시 미국으로 나오지 못할까 걱정이 된다.

내 한편으로는 현재에 내가 강하게 "미국으로 돌아와야만 해"라고 결론 짓는 것이 인 것 같다. 어떤 형태로든 를 남겨놓는 것이 좋지 않을까 싶기도 하면서, 그것을 굳이 내 미래를 신뢰하지 못하고, 미래의 내가 정말 한국이 낫다는 것을 결론 내렸을 때, 미래의 나보다 현재의 나를 지금 내가 믿고 싶은 모습이 그 자체로 역사의 종말 같다.

그렇다면 어떻게 해야할까. 그럼에도 불구하고 를 남겨놓아야 할까. 만약 남겨 놓는다고 했을때, 어떤 형태로 어떤 효과를 가지도록 남겨놓아야 할까. 몇 가지 아이디어를 생각해봤지만 "잠깐 방미해서 를 해체하는 미래의 나"를 이기고, 미래의 나를 미국에 정착시킬 묘안이 나지 않는다. 예를 들어, 미국 은행 계좌에 조건 부 투자금 등을 넣어놓는다고 해도, 내가 미래에 미국에 와서 그냥 돈 가지고 돌아가면 끝 아닌가.

결과적으로는 그냥 미래의 내가 내릴 결정을 믿는 것이 맞을 것인가. 하지만, 나는 결국 풍파를 겪어야 성장하는 사람이라는 것을 많이 배웠는데, 한국에 계속 있다보면 어떤 식으로든 한국에 남는 것이 더 낫다고 자기합리화를 해버릴지도 모른다. 즉, 미래의 내 결정을 온전히 믿을 수 있을까.

여러모로 무엇이 옳은지 헷갈린다. 하지만 이런 문제는 본질적으로 결정이 불가능한 문제인 것이다. 고민해봐야 결국 미래의 나를 믿는 방향으로 결론이 날 것이다. 어떻게 결론이 나든 미래의 내가 미래의 내가 유리할 방향으로 결론을 덮어씌울 것이기 때문이다.

그럼에도 불구하고 내가 이렇게 를 고민하는 것은, 미래의 내게 강력한 경고를 보내기 위함일지도 모른다. 제발 눈을 뜨고 세상을 봐. 이렇게 경고를 하는 나의 그 모습을 기억한다면, 어쩌면 기우일지도.

역사적으로 선왕들은 어떻게 후대 왕들이 Override하지 못하게 정책을 잠궈놨을까? 예를 들어, 등은 어떻게 후대 왕들이 변칙해버릴 수 없었을까? 이 부분을 알아봐야겠다.

Backlinks1