cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
미래는 결국 미성숙한 우리가 만들어낸다

미래는 결국 미성숙한 우리가 만들어낸다

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

사람들은 자신들의 단기적 능력은 과대평가하지만 장기적 능력은 과소평가한다.

먼 미래에 발전해봤자 얼마나 발전하겠어--같은 생각.

그러면서 동시에 먼 미래의 자신이 마법적으로 성장해 모든 것의 해결책을 밝혀냈을 것이라 믿는 양상을 보인다.

인간은 왜 이런 상반된 두 가지 상상을 하는 것일까?

  • 행동경제학에서 계획 오류는 과제를 끝내거나 목표를 이루는 데 드는 시간, 노력, 자원을 과소평가하는 경향이다. 를 제시간에, 예산 안에 끝낼 수 있다고 너무 낙관하게 만든다. "사람들은 자기 단기 능력은 과대평가하고 장기 능력은 과소평가한다"는 말로 요약된다.
  • 심리학에서 자연적 낙관주의 편향은 좋은 결과가 나올 가능성은 과대평가하고 나쁜 결과가 나올 가능성은 과소평가하는 경향이다. 이 편향 때문에 자기 능력이나 프로젝트, 목표가 잘될 거라고 너무 낙관해서, 위험을 더 지거나 덜 신중하게 움직인다.

이 둘은 정반대 얘기처럼 들리지만, 나는 시간을 제대로 못 느끼는 인간의 감각이 보여 주는 양면일 뿐이라고 생각한다.

누가 건강 진단을 받고 생활 습관을 확 바꿔야 하는 상황이라고 해 보자. 단기적으로 그 사람은 자기 능력을 과대평가해서, 짧은 시간 안에 엄청난 변화를 만들 수 있고 건강과 체력도 금방 확 좋아질 거라고 믿는다. 근데 동시에 그 변화를 유지하려면 얼마나 많은 노력과 인내가 드는지는 생각 안 하고, 그냥 몇 가지만 바꾸면 된다고 생각한다. 그러니 그 뒤에 뭐가 필요하고 내가 어떤 사람이 될지는 떠올리지 못한다. 그래서 언젠가 내가 마법처럼 모든 문제를 해결할 거라는 유아적인 기대를 하게 된다. 이 편향들이 겹쳐서 우리는 나쁜 선택을 하고 말도 안 되는 기대를 한다. 결국 생활 습관 하나 지키는 데도 고생하다가, 변화가 더뎌지면 아예 포기해 버린다.

우리의 모든 문제를 해결해 줄 마법 같은 미래는 안 온다. 절대 안 온다. 그냥 시간에 대한 잘못된 편향을 바로잡고, 오랫동안 꾸준히 노력하고 버텨야 한다는 걸 알면 된다.

미래는 결국 미성숙한 우리가 만들어낸다.

시간은 단지 흐르는 개울에 지나지 않는다. 하지만 그 물줄기는 강하고 눈에 띄는 모든 것을 휩쓸어 간다. 그 자리를 다른 것이 차지하면 그것 또한 휩쓸어간다. 이것 역시 휩쓸려간다.

-- 마르쿠스 아우렐리우스 (121--180)

Backlinks4