cho.sh
2,244 notes
Liked on XI made a mistake. When Jack and I decided to organize this $100K Hackathon, my biggest concern was cheating. Unlike a regular hackathon, everyone participates from home. And because the winner is whoever makes the most PROFIT (not revenue), there are so many ways to manipulate the numbers. So I added a $99 entry fee. One thing I’ve learned from building businesses is that people tend to be more committed when they pay for something. I thought it would filter out spam, attract serious builders, and make the competition fairer for everyone. But I completely missed the other side. 3 years ago, I was a living with my apps. Today, I’m financially free. My life changed so much that somewhere along the way, I lost perspective on what $99 means to someone else. For someone in India, someone struggling to pay their bills, or someone trying to make their first dollar online, $99 can be a lot of money. And those are exactly the people I want to help! I’ve spent years sharing what I’ve learned, reviewing random people’s landing pages, and organizing free meetups around the world. Not because there’s money to make, but because I genuinely love seeing people build things and succeed. And somehow, I was so focused on keeping cheaters out that I didn’t realize I was also keeping genuine builders out. That’s my mistake. So I’ve decided to make the $100K Hackathon completely FREE :) Everyone who already paid got a full refund. I’m still worried about cheating. That problem hasn’t disappeared, and Jack and I will have to figure out better ways to verify profits and keep the leaderboard fair. But that’s our problem to solve. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts. Sometimes you need people to remind you of things you’ve forgotten. I genuinely hope this hackathon changes someone’s life. ❤️Liked on XIt’s time to bring back Cafe CursorPosted on Xyo @pendev i can't live share edit a .pen file? it's the most needed featurePosted on XI'm coining a word "Agentsplaining" Agents condescendingly assuming the user don't know fuck and repeating the obviousReplied on X@jayhxmo @raycast Hard to explain. It's the small detailsPosted on X@raycast iOS keyboard is insanely good. Might resub Raycast pro just cuz of thisReplied on X@ishuagra02 I saw a theory that F5.2 is a post train of 5.1, but O5.5 is a distillation of F5.5(unreleased new pretrain) and thats why O5.5 > F5.2Liked on X@anaclumos don't know what is actually improved 👀Posted on Xam i the only one underimpressed with 5.2 fableReplied on X@bvvst great minds think alike https://t.co/YRFWhb1mcOLiked on XClaude Fable 5.2 is out and it's the perfect time to run this god-level prompt on your codebase: "I want you to audit our codebase, is anything here unnecessary, overly complicated in our current setup, or based on weak assumptions? Challenge them. - What can be deleted entirely? - What can be simplified now that unnecessary pieces are gone? Then make the changes. Prefer deleting over simplifying, simplifying over optimizing, and optimizing over automating. This product is being used by thousands of customers, do not cut any corners." This prompt is one I run often and leads to the best results.Replied on X@akshayadinesh19 @bot can we please BYOM for botsLiked on XTo be fair, the Chinese models have a much lower refusal rateLiked on XF*CK IT, im creating a library of AI slop indicators. my feed is full of taste larpers. stay tuned https://t.co/5Muv8nQRm3Liked on XJENSEN! THATS NOT WHAT WE MEANT BY CHINESE MODELS!!!!!!!Liked on Xmy parents had to declare bankruptcy when I was a kid, so they had every reason to pressure me towards a more stable career path instead, they were so patient with me, even as i failed startup after startup for years so getting to tell my mom that everything turned out okay was a really special moment :) for those who can't read Korean, her first message roughly translates to: "Really!!! Congratulations my son. So much :') Thank you God!" i know I've been posting about my exit for like a week now, but it really is a big deal for me and my family! i'll share more about how this all happened and some tactical advice later this week, but for now i'm just riding out all the emotions to quote my mom, thank you God!!!!Liked on X@thefarmers_Dog it stands for Egg GzampleLiked on X🦍 Introducing Memorilla: memory as a modality for LLMs Memorilla turns everything a frozen LLM needs to remember into just 16 memory embeddings ⚡ It uses up to 4,212× fewer tokens and is 27× faster than full context inference while more accurate 🎯 Pushes the Pareto frontier over RAG and agentic memory in personalization, long-document and knowledge QA A thread 🧵:Liked on XThere's a huge product opportunity downstream of Tailscale etc too. At @tldraw we've started designing for "high trust networks" and it's been a beautiful thing. 1. Features that would be a nightmare on the internet are okay on my computer and mostly okay on private networks. Websites that execute user-generated scripts, control production systems, allow for users to send desktop notifications, spend tokens, or directly prompt my agent. Crazy stuff that would only make sense if everyone was in a committed polycule. 2. When everyone on the server can be trusted to have _external_ reasons for good behavior (eg keeping their job, or maintaining friends, family, church, mafia org), the software can be designed in a default social way. Most apps default to isolation, low horizontal visibility, highly restricted collaboration. Makes sense if the social contracts are inside of the app, but if you can trust that they live outside of the app then you can get wild. Example being small group chat names as an emergent comedy phenomenon because anyone in the group can change the name. 3. This can work for commercial products, too, not just internal stuff. Security matters more than ever but the way we've seen that manifest is that more companies are more confident in their own solutions than anything we could provide, to the point where owning data and access is a better value proposition than having it managed. Always has been true for big companies but now even small companies can get a good secure network set up pretty easily, and the hooks we need to build are easy enough. tldraw offline got us started down this road (and shout out to @pendev for first introducing me to the idea of desktop + mcp). We've been bringing that product to private networks and it's been exciting to see how much we can get away with. Keep an eye outReplied on X@saradu birds eye viewLiked on XApplications close in 2 days!! If you have a cool bio idea, and $5-10k will go a long way for you, please apply!!! https://t.co/NCvmrNC53cLiked on XWe've been early adopters of Rust since 2018 and a lot of our infra, voice tech, and even some of the current client is already Rust, the holy grail was getting the whole client there. That means Electron goes away, and so does React Native, mobile keeps native UI but shares app code with desktop via Rust. We hope to get it into testing with users soon™. (And it's not Tauri, it's GPUI, so good guess everyone.) Alright, back to staring at the WoW Forever login screen.Reposted on XOh boy. https://t.co/X7SSskGuGvLiked on XRIP .si domain squatters
Towards Ambient Computing

Towards Ambient Computing

Warning

Over a year old. May be outdated

History of Eidetic Memory Devices

In 1945, the American scientist Vannevar Bush came up with the in his essay As We May Think. The idea was to store a person's conversations, records, and communications in a compressed, mechanical form and pull them back up quickly. The Memex was meant to extend memory. Bush often gets credit for the first vision of the Internet, because closely connected, augmented memories help people think. And this was before ENIAC even existed. Pretty wild.

5426B0

Ted Chiang, the science fiction writer, imagined his own memory aid in his 2013 novel The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feeling. A journalist uses a device called Remem to record every part of their life and recall any of it instantly. In a parallel story, written shakes up a society that used to rely on oral history. If a personal, permanent memory device like Remem became real, it could hit as hard as the internet or written text did.

And it's becoming real.

Lifelogging

In 1994, the inventor Steve Mann live-streamed what he saw through a wearable camera and display, and by 1998 that had grown into the genre of lifelogging. Devices got smaller and smaller. Then smartphones showed up, and most lifelogging devices became obsolete. The original goal was to stream your life to other people in real time, not so much to remember more. Smartphones were perfect for anyone who wanted to broadcast everything to an audience, so a lot of live bloggers switched, and that gave us a new job called streamer.

Mann Wearable Wireless Webcam (1998), Microsoft Sensecam (2004), Mann Fung Lo (2006); Memoto (2013). Glogger, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Then Lifelogging converted to Remembering More

Once smartphones took over broadcasting, lifelogging tools got smaller and turned into memory aids. Memoto's Narrative Clip from 2013 is the classic example. It takes a photo every 30 seconds to document your whole day.

A38ADA

The catch with a camera that shoots on its own is that you end up with thousands of photos a day, and finding the ones that matter is a pain. So in 2016 there was a smarter take, Google Clip. It used AI to decide when a moment was worth a photo. It launched quietly, nobody paid much attention, and it faded away like hundreds of other Killed-By-Google experiments.

Photo by James Bareham / The Verge

The emergence of LLM Lifelogging

Up to this point these were mostly tiny cameras clipped to your body. The big reason was that nothing could summarize the recordings. And then ChatGPT came along.

The first real attempt at an LLM lifelogging device was Robert Dam's Wisper in November 2022. He recorded himself with a phone app and ran the recordings through an LLM. For Dam the big wins were a perfect memory and a personal psychologist (something that could read his conversations and keep an eye on his emotions). But a phone clearly had limits. The software has to run all the time, which kills performance and battery. The only real options were a separate device, or building the software straight into the phone's operating system.

Road towards the Next Apple

A new form factor shifts culture like tectonic plates. Desktops made it normal to sit facing a wall in the corner of a room. Smartphones made it normal to move money while walking down the street. AirPods made it normal to talk out loud like you're talking to yourself. Change the shape of the gadget and you can shake up culture and create new giants. And right now we're on the edge of one of those shifts. The pin.

Soon we might wear a tiny pin, something like an iPod shuffle, around our neck, with AI running in the background all the time. Some might even project images onto your palm. With no display, the battery could last for days. It could record everything you do in a day and hand you a summary.

Sounds like science fiction, but these products are already being built and are slated for release in the next year or so. Here are a few.

In October 2023, Avi Schiffmann showed off the device he'd been working on, the Tab.

C1D591

Right after, the Rewind team announced the Rewind pendant.

A98330

Both pendants use OpenAI Whisper and GPT to record and answer questions on the spot. All of this happened in early October, and judging by how fast things have moved so far, the competition is only going to heat up.

Ambient Computing

And so the idea of ambient computing was born. Humane is a company started by two former Apple directors, one from software and one from design. They want computing that is easily accessible but not intrusive. Their concept is a wearable pin that with a fancy laser projector. Think of it as a lifelogging device with a lot more on top.

853594

E45497

Their pitch was that the device would always be there to help and would remember everything, without the modern smartphones so often bring. They believed we could have a healthy relationship with electronics.

Us in the Ambient Computing Era

In that same Ted Chiang novel, The Truth of Fact, the Truth of Feeling, he writes

Psychologists make a distinction between semantic memory-- knowledge of general facts--and episodic memory, or recollection of personal experiences. We've been using technological supplements for semantic memory ever since the invention of writing: first books, then search engines. By contrast, we've historically resisted such aids when it comes to episodic memory; few people have ever kept as many diaries or photo albums as they did ordinary books... We regarded our episodic memories as such an integral part of our identities that we were reluctant to externalize them, to relegate them to books on a shelf or files on a computer.

Part of me wanted to stop this, to protect children's ability to see the beginning of their lives filtered through gauze, to keep those origin stories from being replaced by cold, desaturated video. But maybe they will feel just as warmly about their lossless digital memories as I do about my imperfect, organic memories.

I'm a product of my time, and times change. We can't prevent the adoption of digital memory any more than oral cultures could stop the arrival of literacy, so the best I can do is look for something positive in it. And I think I've found the real benefit of digital memory. The point is not to prove you were right; the point is to admit you were wrong... What digital memory will do is change those stories from fabulations that emphasize our best acts and elide our worst, into ones that--I hope--acknowledge our fallibility and make us less judgmental about the fallibility of others.

The future I want is one where tech is always there to help, but never so everywhere that it drowns out our own thinking. Tech should be a tool, not a drag. It shouldn't grow like a tumor and suck out our energy and focus. We should use it to our advantage and still be able to think and get by on our own.

Tech is not value-neutral. Some people say the person using it is the one responsible, but that ignores the fact that tech gets built because someone wants it for a specific reason. The first people who ask for a technology are never neutral, because they want it for something. Fritz Haber, who invented nitrogen fixation, was anything but neutral when he developed chlorine gas, driven by his German nationalism. He even studied the international law on using poison gas for killing and came up with a way of deploying the gas that let Germany get around it.

, everywhere these days, is another place where tech is far from neutral. Social media companies like Facebook are known to have teams working on making their products more addictive. That's not so different from drug cartels looking for stronger drugs. Maybe one day we'll look back on this as an era of barbaric social media manipulation, with no limits at all on harvesting human emotions.

Ambient computing raises the same worry. If we put infinitely scrolling video feeds in our glasses, or even on our irises, will our systems be safe? I hope these new companies help us build a healthier relationship with tech, because we failed at that during the smartphone revolution. So I hope ambient computing companies put

  • people's peace of mind over short-term retention
  • human creativity over frantic data collection
  • the flourishing of the human mind over the immediate metrics

I'm excited for the ambient computing era, as long as it stays ambient. Readily available, but never intrusive.

Backlinks3