SEC urged to block Anthropic's IPO over $895B in off-balance-sheet commitments
- Anthropic filed its S-1 for a planned November debut, and the amended registration statement discloses at least $582B in non-cancelable commitments to five companies (Amazon, AMD, Broadcom, Google, Microsoft) out of roughly $895B in total contractual obligations, most running into the 2030s.
- The company holds $96B in cash, its 2026 results have not been formally audited, and third-quarter figures suggest revenue growth flattened over the summer, which the author says Anthropic must reverse to meet its obligations.
- Matt Scherer argues the commitments are debts in a legal and practical sense even though they stay off the balance sheet, and that demand pressure, commoditization, cost pressure, and supply-chain or community opposition squeeze model developer margins.
- Scherer's October 2026 report for the Open Markets Institute and Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund, "Brace for Impact," is the source of the margin-squeeze figure; Anthropic keeps negotiating more infrastructure deals and could end the year above $1T in commitments.
Hacker News opinions
Aren't pension funds automatically buying Anthropic the moment it lists, since it'll be in the S&P 500 like SpaceX?
SpaceX isn't in the S&P 500 yet. Nasdaq is the one that fast-tracked it to dump on retail.
The S&P 500 denied SpaceX early admission. There's a 12 month waiting period plus 4 quarters of positive net earnings before you qualify.
Does index inclusion even happen fast enough after an IPO to matter? I thought index funds had to wait.
No. And the SEC's obligation is to all market participants, not just index fund holders.
These days every rule is maybe this or maybe that depending on political winds. No company should be allowed to IPO without showing steady profit. Anthropic can keep selling shares privately.
This is so dumb. Let the market figure it out. If it goes public and crashes we get a valuable answer that saves tens of billions in wasted capital.
Markets aren't rational, I'm not convinced we shouldn't step in. If I started selling anthrax the government would stop me. Honestly I'd just cap how much hardware data centers can buy per year.
Pension funds and index funds are a market distortion now. Anthropic crashing is harder, and it happens after the mandatory index purchases, which is a transfer from the public to the insiders.
How will the market figure it out when these companies are angling for the too big to fail line? They'll get a bailout for national security reasons and then we're on the hook.
It'll get hammered into oblivion long before S&P 500 inclusion. Maybe they delay the IPO after the election. Doesn't matter much though, if Anthropic fails the bubble pops and the S&P gets ugly anyway.
If a company IPOs it's part of the market by definition, and if you bought an index fund you made that choice and can change it. Do we need the government to protect you from your own choices?
Yes. Too many people have their entire retirement on the line. What's the alternative, let the bubble burst and have the poorest people eat the recession?
The SEC doesn't exist to play favorites. Block them if they broke a law. Otherwise it's unfair to block them for what every other IPO does. Live by market primacy, die by market primacy.
The real worry is bad apples getting into indices and rotting people's futures. Indices can kick them out, and Enron was in the index at some point and we survived.
The law here is the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1913, and it's intentionally vague about what counts as anticompetitive.
Nobody questions why they waited so long to go public. At a $100B valuation everyday people and pension funds could have shared the returns AI already delivered. Instead leadership keeps >$1T for themselves.
A year ago Anthropic was losing billions a year. If it had listed and collapsed everyone would've said they dumped a cash-burning company on pension funds.
If Anthropic can't pay these commitments, what are the odds creditors get together for a mini chapter 11, extending timelines 5 years or canceling a slice? Creditors don't want them going under.
If the SEC allowed the SpaceX IPO it will allow this one, and Anthropic's is far more genuine. Some ETFs already screen out unprofitable companies, which is a great rule.
If companies were already profitable why would they go public? Also Musk gave Trump $290M, Brockman gave $25M, Amodei gave him a hard time. Do the math.
Seems like requiring an audit is the fix. Going public with pinky-swear financials is beyond me.
They have been audited. It's in the S-1.