Krea 3 image editing model enters open beta, claiming 4x speed over Nano Banana Pro
- Krea 3 is an image editing model in open beta that Krea says finishes edits in about 8 seconds and costs $0.06 per image.
- On its landing page, Krea claims 10x faster and 3x cheaper results compared to GPT Image 2 and Nano Banana Pro, and 4x faster than Nano Banana Pro in its headline.
- The model focuses on native regional edits and minimal pixel-level degradation outside the edited area, and it is distributed through fal, Baseten, Comfy, and Together AI.
- Diego from Krea says benchmarks are still in progress, and that the team is considering LoRA fine-tuning and open weights but has not committed to them.
- Commenters say text-to-image is labeled experimental in the beta, and one tester found the signage text in some outputs scrambled and the hex color codes leaking into UI designs.
Hacker News 의견들
Krea 3 is in open beta today, and it's frontier quality at a fraction of the speed and price. Benchmarks aren't out yet, but our internal evals say it beats NBP or GPT Image on both speed and cost.
Krea 2 scored 6 out of 15 on my txt2img benchmark back in June, so I'm eager to run Krea 3. But the beta showed a warning that text-to-image is experimental. Is it still a first-class citizen, or is this mainly an editing model now?
"At a fraction of the speed" normally means slower, and that's not what they mean given the 10x faster claim. The wording is a bit off.
On the $20 GPT plan you get plenty of Codex and image gen. I'd only use Krea if I built a workflow on it for something GPT image can't do. Focus on one-click fine-tuning for design shops with custom looks, since the GPT look is getting stale.
Does "thinking about" open weights mean work left before release, or whether to release at all? Krea 2 was great because it was open, so I hope it's the former.
Why do the frontier models still output that ugly AI texture? Until that's fixed, I don't think AI images can be beautiful or creative.
The trial email for new signups seems broken. I got a 40% discount and Pro for 3 hours, but after three images it wouldn't generate more, so I can't test it against our Nano Banana Pro setup.
The sneaky pricing bugs me. Just offer the discount up front. I'd rather not threaten to cancel every subscription to get a deal.
I used to think that too until I ran a gen AI business. Competitors have sent bot farms to founders' personal Instagram accounts, so consumer tiers get ruthless. Business and enterprise tiers mostly don't have this problem.
Why no FLUX comparison? I'm not a big image model user, so I'm curious whether it just isn't considered frontier.
Flux is open weight and available, while Krea is self-hosted only with an enterprise license. Maybe they don't want customers comparing alternatives.
Any rough numbers on compute or training time?
Krea 2's technical report is out and is probably the most open one around, about an hour of reading. It's a good stopgap until the Krea 3 report.
The pearl earring and billboard worker didn't feel like frontier quality. Otherwise very impressive.
The signage text on the fuzzy characters scene came out scrambled, so it's a no-go for me.
I compared Krea 3 with GPT-Image-2.5 on UI mockups. Krea 3 isn't close on visual creativity, but it renders small text well. Hex codes leak into the design, though, like a stray one in the banking site valuation panel.